MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113461324

Characterizing non-E. coli coliforms as indicators of groundwater susceptibility via “big data”, geostatistical analysis, and machine learning

2025· dissertation· en· W7113461324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFecal contamination and water quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationGroundwaterGroundwater contaminationFecal coliformWater qualityPopulationHydrology (agriculture)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals reliant on private wells for drinking water face a significantly higher risk of acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) compared to those serviced by public water systems, with approximately 1 in 10 Ontarians (~1.6 million people) belonging to this subgroup. Historically, groundwater microbial contamination studies have focused on E. coli presence/absence, with the roles of non-E. coli coliforms (NEC) and microbial magnitudes (CFU/100 mL) in assessing groundwater susceptibility consequently remaining understudied. This PhD thesis seeks to address these gaps via analyses of the Ontario Microbial Water Quality Dataset (OMWQD), which contains >1 million private well samples collected from ~300,000 wells between 2010 and 2021. Three distinct thesis objectives were designed and fulfilled, each analyzing a suite of groundwater quality parameters (i.e., NEC concentration, E. coli concentration, and the NEC:E. coli concentration ratio): 1) develop and evaluate provincial groundwater Contamination Indices which reflect 12 years of groundwater quality data; 2) characterize south Ontario contamination cycles and identify immediate and/or sustained effects of three extreme weather events on microbial contamination; and 3) develop a series of parameter-specific models to explain long-term groundwater contamination across Ontario. Contamination Indices were spatially compared to enteric infection rates and well density, with findings confirming that indices are not biased by rural population density and, based on statistically significant associations with infection rates, represent appropriate spatiotemporal reflections of long-term groundwater quality. Contamination cycle analyses identified E. coli concentration and the NEC:E. coli ratio as complementary metrics, with concurrent interpretation of their seasonal signals indicating that contamination via bypass mechanisms dominates winter months. Developed models suggest NEC may serve as appropriate indicators of the potential for generalized contamination, as the NEC model exhibited high goodness-of-fit on testing datapoints (91.9%). Overall, this work provides foundational evidence for the continued use of NEC as a groundwater quality indicator, improves our knowledge of spatiotemporal variations in contamination mechanisms across Ontario, and provides transferrable results due to the high number of private well samples, multi-year study period, and the study region’s diverse climate, geology, and topography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicFecal contamination and water qualityFrench-language works237,207