MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113463786

Registro de esponjas del orden Poecilosclerida en el Atlantico Sudoccidental

2025· other· es· W7113463786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueConicet · 2025
Typeother
Languagees
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNova scotiaTaxonomy (biology)Stage (stratigraphy)Plateau (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conjunto de datos sobre esponjas del orden Poecilosclerida obtenidas durante las campañas de investigación realizadas en el Banco Burdwood a bordo del buque ARA Puerto Deseado (2016–2017). El conjunto incluye los registros por estación de cada especie identificada en las muestras. Además, se incorpora información complementaria sobre las especies registradas en regiones adyacentes al Banco Burdwood, recopilada a partir de fuentes bibliográficas que abarcan sectores del Arco de Scotia (Islas Georgias del Sur e Islas Orcadas del Sur) y de la Patagonia (Islas Malvinas y Tierra del Fuego).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConicetFrench-language works237,207