MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113572537

Developing novel biomarkers of frontotemporal dementia

2025· other· en· W7113572537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaBiomarkerDiseaseDementiaFrontotemporal lobar degenerationClinical trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical trials for genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are ongoing, yet many early phase studies have failed due to ineffective pre-selected clinical or surrogate endpoints. Unlike other neurodegenerative diseases, FTD lacks well-established biomarkers for diagnosis, staging, and disease progression, partly due to its heterogeneous nature. FTD can be sporadic or genetic, involve multiple proteinopathies, and present with varied clinical phenotypes, including motor symptoms, language problems, and personality changes. This thesis focuses on exploring dynamic fluid biomarkers in samples from the Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative (GENFI), the largest natural history study of genetic FTD in Europe and Canada. The GENFI Biobank, which I helped establish, forms centralised storage of biosamples collected using standardised GENFI protocols. These samples were used to explore biomarkers at baseline visits, but also investigate longitudinal changes in glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain protein (NfL). My research has helped to identify NfL as a disease staging marker, and GFAP as a promising biomarker to track disease progression, specifically in GRN-associated FTD. Therefore, these biomarkers will be useful in disease-modifying therapeutic trials, to identify the right time to administer treatment, track efficacy, and serve as surrogate clinical endpoints. Additionally, I will also explore novel biomarkers of FTD: cytokines from the vascular endothelial growth factor family in the cerebrospinal fluid of both sporadic and genetic FTD participants. Finally, I will examine the neurotrophin receptor p75 extracellular domain in a more distant sample type, urine, to see whether these samples collected as part of GENFI may be useful matrices to identify novel biomarkers, that have yet to be explored in FTD. These findings aim to impact future clinical trials to expedite access to therapeutic intervention for patients suffering from this devastating disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUCL Discovery (University College London)French-language works237,207