MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113608092

Business plan for the marketing of the fruit champa (campomanesia lineatifolia) and export of the freeze fruit to Canada

2020· dissertation· es· W7113608092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBiblioteca Digital Minerva EAN · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlan (archaeology)Work (physics)Marketing plan
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este plan de negocios quiere mostrar un proyecto de emprendimiento el cual está centralizado en un mercado como lo es la pulpa de champa (Campomanesia lineatifolia) siendo una fruta con un valor nutricional importante en vitaminas B1,B2 y C así como Calcio, Hierro y Fosforo este fruto es originario del municipio de Miraflores, Boyacá y de la región de Lengupa, esta región está ubicado a 4 horas y 49 minutos en carro de la ciudad de Bogotá, esta fruta en años anteriores se daba en cualquier parte del municipio, después de un tiempo organizaciones campesinas comenzaron a comercializarlo en la región por su rico y exótico sabor. Este trabajo elabora un plan de negocios para la comercialización de la fruta chamba (Campomanesia lineatifolia) e, esto se llevará a cabo como una solución para el despulpe de la fruta y ver su futura comercialización en la ciudad de Bogotá, colocando una planta despulpadora en el municipio de Miraflores donde se realiza la compra del fruto, la limpieza de este, el despulpado y su empaquetado para posteriormente colocarlo en la cadena de frio y seguir el proceso logístico. En el trabajo se encontrará un análisis financiero y de mercadeo para observar la viabilidad del proyecto, como la inversión, personal que se requiere, su punto de equilibrio y la tasa de retorno.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiblioteca Digital Minerva EANSame topicAgriculture and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207