MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7113702360

Navigating Diamond Mine Closures: Youth Experiences and Land-Based Programs Fostering Community Resilience in the Northwest Territories

2025· dissertation· en· W7113702360 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Community resilienceContext (archaeology)Psychological resilienceGeneral partnershipResource (disambiguation)Focus groupParticipatory action researchQualitative research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the experiences and aspirations of Tłı̨chǫ youth in the context of intersecting social, economic, and environmental crises in the Northwest Territories (NWT), shaped by resource extraction and broader impacts of colonialism and capitalism. With the significant upcoming diamond mine closures in the NWT, this research considers the risks and volatility of the resource extraction industry and the uncertain future dynamics of Tłı̨chǫ communities. Guided by Tłı̨chǫ youth voices, the analysis highlights the environmental monitoring program Ekwǫ Nàxoède K’è (ENK), which serves as an example of Tłı̨chǫ community resilience and cultural revitalization. In partnership with the Tłı̨chǫ Government and supported by the Futures of Care project, this research utilizes qualitative methods including interviews, focus groups, and document analysis to explore youth perspectives on the impacts of mining and land-based programs. The research design and analysis draw from Indigenous, feminist, and youth-centred frameworks, as well as participatory, relational, and community-guided methods. Youth participants described the complex ways in which the diamond mines affect them and their communities, with concerns raised about negative impacts on biodiversity, cultural continuity, and community wellbeing. Discussing the economic shifts from mine closures, Tłı̨chǫ youth expressed anxiety about the future of their communities and questioned the long-term trade-offs that mine-affected regions are faced with. Additionally, Tłı̨chǫ youth reflected on their participation in the ENK program, which they described as a transformative experience with the potential to strengthen wider cultural and community wellbeing. The ENK program carries out caribou monitoring near the diamond mines and is expanding significantly to widen the scope of monitoring, including observing mine closure and remediation efforts. The program is also launching new initiatives to involve more Tłı̨chǫ youth to further support youth wellbeing, skill building, and intergenerational knowledge transfer. Ultimately, this research brings attention to the far-reaching risks of resource extraction and emphasizes an example of Indigenous community resilience and resistance in the face of compounding challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.136

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)→Same topicMining and Resource Management→French-language works237,207→