A Performer's Guide to Canadian Works for Unaccompanied Trumpet and Solo Trumpet with Piano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this treatise is to provide a practical and accessible point of reference for trumpeters and teachers looking to find Canadian trumpet literature for performance and/or pedagogical purposes. The scope of this project includes all works for unaccompanied trumpet or one trumpet with piano accompaniment that were housed in the Canadian Music Centre (CMC) libraries as of May 15, 2012. The CMC "holds Canada's largest collection of Canadian concert music" and "exists to promote the works of its Associate Composers in Canada and around the world." Of the more than 750 composers who have passed the peer review process to be granted Associate Composer status, fourty-four individuals have written fifty-seven works that fit the requirements of this study. Brief biographical information is included for each composer along with a quote, when available, concerning his/her work(s) for trumpet and/or general composition style. Repertoire entries will include information on difficulty, range, technical challenges, and musical considerations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".