Formation of niobium hydride precipitates in superconducting qubits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report evidence for the formation of niobium hydride phase within niobium films on silicon substrates in superconducting qubits fabricated at Rigetti Computing. For this study, we combined complementary techniques—including room-temperature and cryogenic atomic force microscopy (AFM), synchrotron x-ray diffraction, and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS)—to directly reveal the existence of niobium hydride precipitates on the surface of superconducting qubits. Upon cryogenic cooling, we observed variation in the size and morphology of the hydrides, ranging from small (∼5 nm) irregular shapes to large (∼10–100 nm) domains within the Nb grains, which were fully converted to niobium hydrides. Since niobium hydrides are nonsuperconducting and can easily change in size and location upon different cooldowns to cryogenic temperature, our finding highlights a previously unknown source of decoherence in superconducting qubits. This contributes to quasiparticle losses, offering a potential explanation for changes in qubit performance upon cooldowns. Finally, by leveraging the RF performance of a 3D bulk Nb resonator, we quantify RF dissipation in a superconducting qubit caused by hydrogen concentration variation, and propose a practical engineering pathway to mitigate the formation of Nb hydrides for superconducting qubit applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".