MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7113896649 · doi:10.57908/cons.2025.2.112040

Dornröschen von Obercunnersdorf

2025· article· de· W7113896649 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarpentryBeautySection (typography)Work (physics)CzechQuarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sleeping Beauty of Obercunnersdorf. Restoration of a half-timbered house. Work report from an ongoing project Upper Lusatian Houses, referred to as „Umgebindehäuser” are mainly found in the border triangle of Germany, the Czech Republic and Poland. For centuries, they were the region's defining building style. The houses combine construction methods that otherwise occur separately: Solid construction, half-timbered construction and log construction. Some were farmhouses with a solid stable section on the ground floor and a living room made of logs. Others were built for weavers and often had a second log room instead of the stable section. These houses and thus the building style seem to be dying out. Only around 6000 houses are still standing. The house presented here is located in Obercunnersdorf and has been undergoing restoration since 2022. After being vacant for over 20 years, the house was in poor condition and first had to be made stable with the help of an experienced carpentry firm. The aim was to preserve the house as authentically as possible, but still equip it with modern comforts such as central heating, bathrooms and kitchens. Once the project is complete, there will be two new apartments with low ceilings and old windows for people who appreciate the charm of old houses and want to live like this.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207