MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A007: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) drive tumor cell growth in early-onset human gastric cancer

2025· article· en· W7113898951 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcitonin gene-related peptideImmunohistochemistryStromal cellCancerCell growthReceptorCalcitoninOrphan receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Global rates of gastric cancer (GC) are rising among individuals under the age of 50, yet the underlying drivers of early-onset GC remain unknown. Tumour cells are highly adaptive and exploit various components of their microenvironment, including nerves, to support and accelerate growth. In this study, we investigated the expression and function of the sensory neuropeptide CGRP and its receptor component RAMP1, aiming to uncover novel mechanisms by which cancer cells leverage neuropeptide signaling to promote tumor growth and potentially uncover new avenues to exploit in the treatment of early onset GC. Methods: We analyzed patient samples using multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) to assess CGRP and RAMP1 expression across different histological and anatomical subtypes of human GC. RAMP1 expression was correlated with patient demographics and tumor characteristics, including age, pathological features and molecular/genomic subtypes. In addition, RAMP1 expression and association with patient survival were evaluated using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Finally, we examined the function of CGRP on tumor cells using in vitro stimulation assays followed by RNA sequencing and Crispr/Cas9 deletion of RAMP1, to further interrogate the mechanism of CGRP activity. Results: Analysis of RAMP1 expression in human gastric tumors using TCGA data, revealed that RAMP1 expression was significantly associated with poorer patient outcomes. We next stained patient tumours using mIHC for RAMP1 and its ligand CGRP. Interestingly, we observed an increase in RAMP1 expression in early onset GC patients. CGRP was abundantly expressed in stromal regions, potentially highlighting nerve fiber localization in close proximity to tumor cells. Notably, in subset of patients, over 50% of tumor cells were capable of producing CGRP. Finally, CGRP stimulation enhanced tumor cell growth in a RAMP1-dependent manner, inducing genes linked to proliferation, metabolism, and migration. Conclusion: Our findings uncover a potential role for CGRP-RAMP1 signaling in driving tumor growth in early-onset GC. This neuropeptide axis may represent a critical mechanism by which young patients' tumors exploit neural cues for progression. Further investigation into age-specific drivers of GC is warranted, and CGRP-RAMP1 signaling emerges as a promising therapeutic target in this context. Citation Format: Pavitha Parathan, Kelly Tran, Liam Neil, Annalisa L E. Carli, Yang Liao, Jessica D G. Duarte, Anne Huber, Bhupinder Pal, Isaac M. Chiu, Conor J. Kearney, Wei Shi, John M. Mariadason, David S. Williams, Michael Buchert, Lisa A. Mielke. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) drive tumor cell growth in early-onset human gastric cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: The Rise in Early-Onset Cancers—Knowledge Gaps and Research Opportunities; 2025 Dec 10-13; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(23_Suppl):Abstract nr A007.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseFrench-language works237,207