Refined shoulder kinematics via markerless bony landmark detection and acromial 3D shape using an RGB-D camera during hand-cycling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Biomechanical biofeedback has the potential to enhance rehabilitation by providing clinicians with objective evaluation of patient performances. As feedback systems often depend on expensive and sophisticated motion capture technologies, researchers explore computer vision-based alternatives. Existing methods suffer from substantial joint angle errors, particularly in the upper limb, and neglect the scapular movements. We developed an approach for detecting bony landmarks and performing refined upper-limb kinematics assessments using a single consumer-grade depth-sensing camera. Unlike other markerless methods, our model incorporates the scapula, offering comprehensive shoulder joint kinematics. Annotated images from eight participants were used to fine-tune a convolutional neural network, which was subsequently evaluated on a hand-cycling motion. Our method showed a strong agreement with a reference marker-based system, with 3D bony landmark detection errors averaging 5 mm. The resulting kinematics closely aligned with the reference system, maintaining acceptable joint angle errors (∼6.3°). Furthermore, the algorithm could provide real-time bony landmark positions and joint kinematics at a rate of 50 Hz. This study highlights the potential of using a single consumer-grade depth-sensing camera combined with an acromial 3D-shape to accurately estimate upper-limb kinematics through bony landmark detection, paving the way for more accessible clinical assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".