MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Հիշողությունը և տրավման տապանագրային ու սգերգային ժառանգության համատեքստում

2025· article· W7113900501 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueԳիտական աշխատություններ · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsGrieg Seafood (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreNarrativeEthnographyIconographyField (mathematics)Collective memoryCultural heritageField research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines cemeteries formed after the 1988 Spitak earthquake as unique cultural archives that have preserved multi-layered narratives of personal and collective memory, grief, faith, and identity. Drawing on local fieldwork, photographs, and ethnographic data, the study examines how cemeteries have become sites of memory, reflecting not only individual tragedies but also the process of rebuilding public identity. For the first time, the epigraphic and oral funeral legacies of Gyumri are combined, viewing them as a complementary memory system that unites material and non-material culture. This approach allows us to identify models of post-disaster memory formation that can be applied to other regions. Methods and materials: The research uses an interdisciplinary approach, combining the methods of cultural and narrative analysis to reveal the interrelationships between personal memories, symbolic images, and the formation of public memory. During the research, we used field folklore materials recorded by us /-K.S. and R.H./, which include local traditions, artistic inscriptions on tombstones, and oral narratives of disaster memory. Field studies were conducted after the 1988 earthquake in the old and new cemeteries of Shirak and Gyumri. Analysis: Within the framework of narrative analysis, the texts of tombstones, their symbolism, and iconography were studied. Results. The results of the analysis show that the epigraphic and oral funeral heritage of Gyumri reflects not only the general patterns of post-disaster cultural memory, but also a unique local model, which can be characterized as a dual memory system. This system is formed by the complementary interaction of material and non-material memory. Authors' contribution: They jointly wrote and systematized a large amount of material related to cemetery culture, tombstone art and oral narratives, conducted a study to find out how cemeteries, as cultural archives, preserve our identity and memory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueԳիտական աշխատություններSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207