Enhancing Oil-Water Separation: Impact of Nanoparticle Coatings on Quartz Particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The growing need for efficient oil-water separation technologies remains a critical challenge due to the persistence of stable emulsions in industrial wastewater.Conventional ceramic membranes are often expensive, while polymeric alternatives suffer from fouling and limited durability.This study addresses these challenges by investigating the modification of low-cost quartz particles with hydrophobic nanoparticle coatings to enhance their separation efficiency.The specific objectives were to (i) evaluate the influence of sequential nanoparticle coatings (one to four layers) on surface morphology and wettability, and (ii) develop mathematical models to quantify oil rejection efficiency and nanoparticle distribution.Experimental results revealed that a single coating produced the most uniform nanoparticle layer, achieving a significant reduction in oil and grease concentration in the permeate (29.3 mg/L).Additional coatings led to clustering and surface irregularities, which negatively impacted performance.The findings demonstrate the potential of optimized quartz-based materials as scalable and environmentally sustainable solutions for oily wastewater treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".