INTELLIGENCES ALTERNATIVES. FORMES ET PRATIQUES DES RÉSURGENCES INDIGÈNES MONDIALES. RÉSURGENCE AUTOCHTONE À LA LUMIÈRE DE L’ART DE JOSÉPHINE BACON
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The word Innu means “human” in the Innu language, asserting both the universality of human beings and the cultural and visionary differences that unite us all (Dezutter, Fontaine, Létourneau 2021, p. 77). In Innu philosophy, this implies that before we are nationals of any state, we are first and foremost human beings. Consequently, relationality – or connectedness to other human cultures and to the natural environment – lies at the heart of contemporary Innu (and broader Canadian Indigenous) literature (Wilson 2008; King 1990). While deeply rooted in ancient oral traditions, this literature re-invents those traditions in resistance to hegemonic discourses, cultural biases, and the generic binaries long perpetuated by the West. It also serves as a means of rediscovering the self and claiming a rightful – though historically denied – place in history. This article draws on the work of contemporary Canadian Innu poet Joséphine Bacon to explore the significance of her poetry in the decolonization of Indigenous cultures and the rediscovery of identity. It examines traditional storytelling, visual art forms, metaphors, and worldviews to analyze how Bacon’s poetry: (a) challenges and redefines the literary canon by reinventing tradition; (b) contributes to the Indigenous literary and cultural resurgence; and (c) engages in dialogue with contemporary decolonial thinkers, particularly Édouard Glissant (1990, 2009) and his philosophical and poetic concept of the archipel. The article adopts an Indigenous critical methodology rooted in Bacon’s poetic practice, in conjunction with comparative decolonial perspectives. *Support for this research was received from the SNSF
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".