MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114794641 · doi:10.48660/25120030

Soft Charges and Energy-Energy Correlators in the 'in-in' Formalism

2025· other· en· W7114794641 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePIRSA · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormalism (music)Field (mathematics)Scaling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently there has been significant interest in energy-energy correlators which measure the energy flux created at the point of collision by calorimeter-like detectors at asymptotically large distances. The primary building blocks of these observables are Average Null Energy operators (ANECs) which bear a strong resemblance to part of the charges associated to the symmetries of asymptotically flat spacetimes. In this talk, I will elucidate that relationship and show that calculable quantities that are more familiar in discussions of asymptotic symmetries and flat-space holography can be written in terms of energy-energy correlators, thereby allowing for natural connections to observables at particle experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePIRSAFrench-language works237,207