MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114796849 · doi:10.3138/cjc-2025-0049

Revisiting Governmentality: Collapsing Information Silos and Emerging Biopolitical Economies of Circulation

2025· article· en· W7114796849 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Communication · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFoucault, Power, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculation (fluid dynamics)GovernmentalityMateriality (auditing)PoliticsBiopowerLicenseObstacle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In 1977–78, Foucault outlined the theory of “governmentality,” which accounts for how populations are secured in milieus of circulation. For Foucault, security involves tapping into political economy and engaging apparatuses of security to ensure freedom of movement. Analysis: This article examines collapsing governmental and commercial information silos and presents two brief case studies (automated license plate readers and abortion surveillance) to explore how Foucault’s theory of governmentality applies to the extraterritorial movement of populations in biopolitical economies of circulation today. Conclusions and implications: Tapping into political economy today means exploiting the key materiality of data to which bodies are biologically bound. The authors call for a reinvigoration of governmentality, applying it to the current moment when securing the movement of populations in biopolitical economies of circulation is more germane than ever.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CommunicationSame topicFoucault, Power, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207