MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114802852 · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3643368

Smooth Variable Structure Filter in Random Finite Set Applications

2025· article· W7114802852 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)Filter (signal processing)Filter designFiltering problemEnsemble Kalman filterComputational complexity theoryAdaptive filterInvariant extended Kalman filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data association and filter robustness are two key problems for general multiple target tracking. Classic data association methods have high computational complexity, and the gold standard Kalman Filter (KF) suffers when the motion model does not match target behavior. Random Finite Set (RFS) based filters such as the Probability Hypothesis Density (PHD) filter solves the computational complexity issue of data association by using one multiple-target filter instead of multiple single-target filters in parallel, and the Smooth Variable Structure Filter (SVSF) improves filter robustness by bounding the estimation error using sliding mode control theory. However, there has not been an attempt to merge these two filtering strategies in literature. This paper presents 3 contributions to this problem: a methodology to combine the SVSF filtering strategy into the PHD filtering framework, results that show improvement in performance over traditional PHD filtering, and modifications to improve computational complexity. Three nonlinear filters are created and tested against the two common nonlinear PHD filters in a complex simulation with time varying targets, model mismatch, and high process noise. The variants show stability and robustness in situations where the original filters diverges. The filters are evaluated using the Optimal Subpattern Assignment (OSPA) metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207