MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114892917 · doi:10.21979/n9/hoaful

Replication Data for: Black Swan: Abductive and Defeasible Video Reasoning in Unpredictable Events

2025· dataset· W7114892917 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDR-NTU (Data) · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDefeasible estateAbductive reasoningReplication (statistics)Benchmark (surveying)Black boxDefeasible reasoningModel-based reasoning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BlackSwanSuite is a benchmark for evaluating VLMs’ ability to reason about unexpected events through abductive and defeasible tasks. The tasks either artificially limit the amount of visual information provided to models while questioning them about hidden unexpected events, or provide new visual information that can change an existing hypothesis about the event. It contains over 3,800 MCQs, 4,900 generative, and 6,700 yes/no questions spanning 1,655 videos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.010
Open science0.0250.042
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDR-NTU (Data)French-language works237,207