MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114893729 · doi:10.11588/san.2020.1.114525

Architektura miast. Refleksje o przestrzeni miejskiej od XIX do XXI wieku

2025· article· de· W7114893729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2025
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitecturePublic spaceUrban spaceSpace (punctuation)Function (biology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Urban landscapeJudaism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Architecture of cities. Reflections on urban space from the 19th to the 21st century Imaginations about the city are changeable and diverse, sometimes built under the influence of generalized definitions based on historical and sociological research, but much more often they result from our individual experiences and memories. The eighth volume of Studies in Modern Architecture is a story about cities - diverse, colorful, with a unique atmosphere, characteristic smells and the luggage of history; about cities created by successive generations who hoped that they would become modern, that they would be islands of freedom and a place friendly to life. The volume includes studies on Parisian fountains, commemorative plaques in Kharkiv, and the Jewish architectural heritage in Lviv. Through the Woolworth skyscraper, we will move to New York’s Manhattan from the beginning of the 20th century. We will take a walk around the city of Warsaw and a modernist block of flats, as well as a journey through the stations of Japan and Europe, which not only perform a function related to public transport, but also constitute a modern culture-forming space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicUrban Development and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207