MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114908522 · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf631.062

ProtBert-BFD token classification improves intrinsically disordered protein region prediction

2025· article· en· W7114908522 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBriefings in Bioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Structure and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecurity tokenInferenceGeneralizability theoryScalabilityClassifier (UML)AnnotationMultilayer perceptronPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) lack stable tertiary structures yet are crucial to transcriptional regulation, signal transduction, and molecular recognition. Experimental annotation of IDRs remains limited—only ~25,000 disordered proteins are cataloged compared with hundreds of millions of known sequences—highlighting the need for scalable computational prediction. We present a systematic evaluation of classical, deep, and transformer-based models for IDR prediction and introduce a fine-tuned ProtBert-BFD token classification framework that achieves high accuracy and generalizability in data-limited settings. Methods Using manually curated annotations from the DisProt database, redundant sequences were filtered with CD-HIT (<30% similarity) and restricted to ≤526 residues, producing ~700 high-quality sequences. The dataset was partitioned (70:15:15) into training, validation, and test sets. We compared multiple architectures: (1) logistic regression and multilayer perceptron as classical baselines; (2) bidirectional and Seq2Seq LSTMs capturing sequential dependencies; and (3) ProtBert-BFD models leveraging pretrained protein-language embeddings for residue-level classification. Results Classical models showed limited predictive power (AUC 0.56–0.69), while LSTM variants improved recall but overfitted due to data imbalance. ProtBert-BFD fine-tuning substantially enhanced accuracy (75.6%), recall (68.4%), and F1-score (64.0%). The token classification variant achieved precision 0.816, recall 0.823, and F1 0.815—surpassing all internal baselines and approaching the state-of-the-art PROFbval model (recall 0.835). Average inference time was only 1.8 s per 530-residue sequence, enabling proteome-scale deployment. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that pretrained transformers effectively capture disorder-related sequence contexts and outperform conventional deep learning in low-data regimes. By integrating transfer learning with efficient inference, the ProtBert-BFD token classification model provides a robust framework for large-scale IDR annotation. Future work will expand datasets, incorporate physicochemical descriptors, and analyze error distributions to refine understanding of protein disorder in health and disease. References Hu, G., Katuwawala, A., Wang, K. et al. flDPnn: Accurate intrinsic disorder prediction with putative propensities of disorder functions. Nat Commun 12, 4438 (2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBriefings in BioinformaticsSame topicProtein Structure and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207