MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114911495 · doi:10.5194/ica-abs-10-100-2025

Advancing the Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure: Innovations in Automation, Sustainability and Accessible Web Cartography for Mapping the Arctic’s Fragile Ecosystem

2025· article· en· W7114911495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisSustainabilityWeb mappingGeographic information systemGeovisualizationField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI) is the collection of geospatial data and the standards, policies, applications, and governance that facilitate its access, use, integration, and preservation for the benefit of and use by all Canadians.To foster innovation, inclusion, interoperability, and sustainability in geospatial data particularly in support of mapping and monitoring the Arctic's fragile ecosystems and to increase the adoption and implementation of standards, Natural Resources Canada's CGDI Division is developing the following products: Pan-Arctic Wetland Inventory Baseline derived from satellite imagery and ground-truth data using a machine learning and cloud computing classification methodology o Led by Natural Resources Canada, in collaboration with Arctic National Mapping Agencies, Arctic Council and organisations responsible for wetland conservation, a seamless Arctic wetland's dataset over millions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it