MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7114919809 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17890711

Neotridactylus apicialis

2025· article· W7114919809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSubspeciesRange (aeronautics)Variation (astronomy)Digging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neotridactylus apicialis (Say 1825) Figs. 21A–D, 22A, 23 Type locality. USA: Florida: St. John’s River, and Iowa: Council Bluff, on Missouri River. Holotype repository. The type material is lost according to Günther (1975). Etymology. Presumably apicialis refers to the apical edges of the wings; in the original description, Say (1825) describes “...wings edged and tipped with blackish”. Distribution. Günther (1975) describes this as the most wide-ranging species of the genus, with specimens recorded from Peru to southern Canada. All the Florida material examined by Günther, as well as all material collected during the present study, is from the northern ⅔ of the state (as far south as Lakeland), although we note that there is a single iNaturalist record of a nymph from Miami-Dade county, indicating that it likely occurs sporadically across the entire state. Variation. Günther (1975) indicated that there is considerable variation in several morphological characters across the wide range of this species, including coloration, overall body size, wing length, and shape/spination of the foretibia, but that characters of the male and female terminalia were uniform throughout. He did not describe subspecies within N. apicialis. Perhaps most striking and noticeable among these variable morphological characters is the shape of the foretibia. As described by Günther (1975), “…the central notch between the digging spines at the distal edge can be more or less deep, and the two forked branches can be asymmetrically shaped”. Examples of this latter variation can be seen in Fig. 21C and 22A. The only specimens I have seen which possess these striking forelimbs are from northern Florida and Georgia, and in all other respects they matched the description of typical apicialis. Notably, N. archboldi and N. insularis sp. nov. never have foretibia with asymmetrically shaped lobes as in these individuals. Interestingly, all the specimens examined with this morphology are males, suggesting some sort of sexual selective pressure at work, but there is too little evidence to say anything for certain. Material examined (n=94). USA, Alabama • 1 ♂, Clarke County: Silver Creek Campground, 10km N Gosport; 29 May 1991; Davidson, Zanol, Acciavatti leg. (CMNH) • USA, Florida • 1 ♀, Leon County: Rock Bluff, Apalachicola NF; 02 July 1994; M. and S. Deyrup leg.; mesic hardwoods (ABS) • 2 ♀, Liberty County: Torreya St Pk.; 21 April 1984; R. Turnbow leg. (UGCA) • 2 ♂, 2 nymphs, Liberty County: Bristol Landing Park: 30.440, -84.986; 22 July 2022; B. Woo leg. (TAMUIC) • 1 ♀, Madison County: Jct. 53 and I-10; 08 July 1992; M. Deyrup leg. (ABS) • 3 ♂, 7 ♀, 11 nymphs, Washington County: Chipley Whitewater Lakes: 30.483, -85.551; 17 June 2023; B. Woo leg. (TAMUIC) • USA, Georgia • 1 ♀, Effingham County; 28 April 1984; R. Morris leg. (UGCA) • 1 ♂, Montgomery County: 3 mi. N. Uvalda; 13–14 July 1985; R. Morris leg.; blacklight (UGCA) • 1 ♀, Oconee County: Oconee Forest near lake; 18 September 2008; SY Lim leg. (UGCA) • 9 ♂, 9 ♀, Wheeler County: 2.2 km NNE Lumber City, Alligator Creek WMA: 31.945, -82.666; 21–24 June 2020; UV light trap in sandhills; JK Adams leg. (CMNH) • 1 ♂, 3 ♀, Wheeler County: same location and dates as previous: 31.949, -82.674; UV light trap in sandhills; JK Adams leg. (CMNH) • 5 ♂, 4 ♀, Wheeler County: same location and dates as previous: 31.947, -82.670; UV light trap in sandhills; JK Adams leg. (CMNH) • 1 ♂, Wheeler County: same location as previous: 31.948, -82677; 13 June 2021; R Androw and K. Karns leg.; UV/MV light (CMNH) • 1 ♂, 2 ♀, Wheeler County: 3.4 km NNE Lumber City, Alligator Creek WMA: 31.956, -82.665; 21–24 June 2020; UV light trap in woodland habitat; JK Adams leg. (CMNH) • 6 ♂, 5 ♀, Wheeler County: 3.7 km NNE Lumber City: Alligator Creek WMA: 31.963, -82.679; 21–24 June 2020; JK Adams leg; UV light trap in cypress-sandhills-woodland ecotone (CMNH) • USA, Illinois • 1 ♀, St. Clair County: 2.2km WNW East St. Louis: 38.630, -90.175; 121m; 25 May–08 June 2018; S. Mills leg. (CMNH) • USA, Michigan • 1 ♀, Washtenaw County: Whitmore Lake; October 04, 1949; H. Clench leg. (CMNH) • USA, North Carolina • 1 ♀, Dare County: Buxton, Cape Hatteras; 23 July 1975; SM Gifford leg. (CMNH) • 1 ♀, Dare County: Roanoke Island; 14 July 1976; SM Gifford leg. (CMNH) • 1 ♂, Dare County: Manteo: 20 July 1980; SM Gifford leg. (CMNH) • USA, Ohio • 1 ♀, Butler County: 2 km NE Port Union: 39.342, -84.444; 185m; 14–28 August 2017; E. Larue leg.; blacklight (CMNH) • USA, Tennessee • 6 ♀, Shelby County: Willington; 04–05 July 1986; WH Yackley leg. (CMNH) • USA, Texas • 3 ♀, Gonzales County: Palmetto State Park; 13 October 1983; J. Rawlins and R. Davidson leg. (CMNH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→