MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114920823 · doi:10.5066/p14h7mvu

Co-polarized Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Change Map between 11/28/2025 and 12/09/2025, Hubbard Glacier Earthquake

2025· dataset· W7114920823 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUSGS DOI Tool Production Environment · 2025
Typedataset
Language
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic aperture radarInterferometric synthetic aperture radarGlacierRadar imagingRadar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This data release contains a radar-based remote sensing product used to detect regions of surface change in southern Yukon Territory, Canada and southeast Alaska, United States between November 28, 2025 and December 9, 2025, based on the availability of Sentinel-1 satellite data. Much of this surface change is interpreted to have been triggered by the M7.0 Hubbard Glacier Earthquake that occurred on December 6, 2025. This dataset was used to map probable landslides based on the increase of surface roughness that occurred between acquisitions (Allstadt and others, 2025). The co-polarized amplitude difference (vv_diff_dB_20251128_20251209) measures the change in strength of the synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter signal between acquisitions. SAR amplitude data were downloaded from the Sentinel-1 Ground Range Detection product collection from the Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem (available at https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/). The data are from Sentinel-1 satellites' ascending track 50. This collection is provided in the dB scale, multi-looked to 10x10 m/pixel, and geocoded. I selected the co-polarized data for each acquisition and differenced the acquisitions to produce the data product. The data product shows all surface change between acquisitions and regions of poor data quality have not been masked. Some reasons for surface change in a snowy, mountainous environment include landslides, snow avalanches, new snowfall, changes in surface moisture, glacier movement and more (e.g., Rott and Mätzler, 1987; Lindsay and others, 2025). Reasons for poor data quality might include foreshortening and shadowing due to steep topography and the look angle of the satellite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUSGS DOI Tool Production EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207