Toward Graph-Based Decoding of Tumor Evolution: Spatial Inference of Copy Number Variations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Constructing a comprehensive spatiotemporal map of tumor heterogeneity is essential for understanding tumor evolution, with copy number variation (CNV) being a significant feature. Existing studies often rely on tools originally developed for single-cell data, which fail to utilize spatial information, often leading to an incomplete map of clonal architecture. Our study aims to develop a model that fully leverages spatial omics data to elucidate spatio-temporal changes in tumor evolution. Methods: Here, we introduce SCOIGET (Spatial COpy number Inference by Graph on Evolution of Tumor), a novel framework using graph neural networks with graph attention layers to learn spatial neighborhood features of gene expression and infer copy number variations. This approach integrates spatial multi-omics features to create a comprehensive spatial map of tumor heterogeneity. Results: Notably, SCOIGET achieves a substantial reduction in error metrics (e.g., mean squared error, cosine similarity, and distance measures) and produces superior clustering performance, as indicated by higher Silhouette Scores compared to existing methods, validated by both simulated data with spot-level ground truth and patient cohorts. Our model significantly enhances the accuracy of tumor evolution depiction, capturing detailed spatial and temporal changes within the tumor microenvironment. It is versatile and applicable to various downstream tasks, demonstrating strong generalizability across different spatial omics platforms, including 10× Visium and Visium HD and various cancer types, including colorectal cancer and prostate cancer. This robust performance improves research efficiency and provides valuable insights into tumor progression. Conclusions: SCOIGET offers an innovative solution by integrating multiple features and advanced algorithms, providing a detailed and accurate representation of tumor heterogeneity and evolution, aiding in the development of personalized cancer treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".