MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114927068 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17895057

Scytodes joniae Iost, Alayón & Rheims, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· W7114927068 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData collectionWork (physics)TaperingData collection system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scytodes joniae sp. nov. Figs 71–78, 95–98, 136 Type material. Holotype: ♂, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: La Altagracia Province: Occidental, San Rafael de Yuma, Cueva de Linea, Parque Nacional los Haitises, 19.07796ºN, 69.46355ºW, 7 mts., 12 June 2012, Team CarBio leg., USNM782341, DR008 (NMNH). Paratypes: DOMINICAN REPUBLIC: La Altagracia Province: 1 ♀, same collection data as for holotype, USNM785538 (NMNH); 1 ♀, same collection locality as for previous specimen, Cueva La Arena, 19.0800ºN, 69.4650ºW, 17 mts., 12 June 2012, Team CarBio leg., USNM782490, DR007 (NMNH); 1 ♀, same collection data as for previous specimen, USNM785252 (NMNH); 1 ♀, same collection data as for previous specimen, USNM782496 (NMNH); 1 ♀, same collection data as for previous specimen, USNM784365 (NMNH); 1 ♀, same collection data as for previous specimen, USNM785799 (NMNH). Etymology. The specific name is a matronym honoring the Canadian singer-songwriter Joni Mitchell, known for her influential work in folk, jazz, and pop music, and for her complex compositions and poetic lyrics. Diagnosis. Males of S. joniae sp. nov. resemble those of S. cubensis (Figs 16–18, 61, 62), S. mingusi sp. nov. (Figs 89, 90, 100, 101), S. noeli (Alayón, 1992: fig. 3), S. reinhardti sp. nov. (Figs 112, 113, 128, 129) and S. robertoi (Alayón, 1977: fig. 2C) by the palp with a piriform bulb and a slender, tapering embolus. They are distinguished from S. robertoi by the bulb with a median constriction (vs. lacking in S. robertoi); from S. mingusi sp. nov. by the filiform embolus (vs. thicker at base in S. mingusi sp. nov.); from S. noeli by the straight embolus (vs. curved in S. noeli); and from S. reinhardti sp. nov. by the shorter cymbium, roughly 1.5 times tibia length, and bulb, roughly as long as embolus (vs. cymbium with more than 1.8 times tibia length and bulb 1.6 times longer than embolus in S. reinhardti sp. nov.). Females resemble those of S. coltrainei sp. nov. (Figs 12, 13, 36), S. cubensis (Figs 21, 22, 63–70), and S. jimmorrisoni sp. nov. (Figs 59, 60, 99) by the vulva with S-shaped IS. They are distinguished from S. coltrainei sp. nov. by the shorter IS, approximately three times longer than the OS (Figs 78, 95, 96) (vs. more than four times longer in S. coltrainei sp. nov.); from S. cubensis by the PS simple and untwisted (vs. twisted and coiled in S. cubensis); and from S. jimmorrisoni sp. nov. by the IS with the same with throughout its entire length (vs. widened at base in S. jimmorrisoni sp. nov.). Description. Male (USNM782341, holotype): prosoma pale golden yellow with brown markings; chelicerae pale yellow; legs pale yellow with brown markings; labium grayish brown; endites pale yellow with brown outlines; sternum pale yellow with brown dotted markings; opisthosoma grayish yellow with scattered brown markings (Figs 71, 72). Total length 3.8; prosoma: 2.0 long, 1.6 wide; sternum: 1.1 long, 0.8 wide; labium: 0.22 long, 0.25 wide; opisthosoma: 1.7 long, 1.3 wide; eye diameters: PME 0.15, ALE.014, PLE 0.13; legs: I – (3.8, rest of leg absent); all other legs absent. Palp: cymbium with two apical spines; embolus long and filiform, slightly curving at tip (Figs 73, 74, 97, 98). Measurements: tibia 0.39; cymbium 0.67; bulb 0.68. Female (paratype, USNM785252): prosoma golden brown, with dark brown markings; chelicerae pale yellow with brown margins; legs golden yellow with brown ring-marks; labium dark brown with two oval-shaped paleyellow spots; endites dark brown with golden yellow bases; sternum golden yellow covered with brown markings; opisthosoma grayish yellow with scattered brown markings (Figs 75, 76). Measurements: total length 6.3; prosoma: 2.4 long, 1.9 wide; sternum: 1.1 long, 0.9 wide; labium: 0.28 long, 0.3 wide; opisthosoma: 3.9 long, 2.0 wide; eye diameters: PME 0.11, ALE 0.11, PLE 0.10; legs: I: 9.6 (3.0, 0.5, 3.0, 2.15, 0.95); II: − (2.3, 0.5, 2.25, 2.2, absent); III: 5.85 (1.6, 0.5, 1.55, 1.5, 0.7); IV: 8.1 (2.3, 0.5, 2.25, 2.3, 0.75). Female genitalia: positioning ridges postero-laterad, hood-like, four times wider than long, separated from each other by twice their width (Fig. 77). Vulva: IS slightly widened at tip; OS roughly five times longer than wide, with the same width throughout its length and apically rounded; antero-laterad; PS with mediad loop (Fig. 78). Variation. Females (n=6): total length 4.8–6.3; prosoma length 2.3–2.6; femur I length 2.9–3.0. Distribution. Known from Parque Nacional los Haitises, Dominican Republic (Fig. 136).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicBryophyte Studies and RecordsFrench-language works237,207