MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114946224

"Dismantling the 'Master’s House': Building a 'World House' Curriculum for Twenty-First-Century U.S. Protestant Theological Education"

2025· article· W7114946224 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtestantismCurriculumMetaphorAgency (philosophy)Sacred theologyCurriculum studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audre Lorde proclaimed four decades ago, “For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” As a self-identified “Black, lesbian, feminist, socialist, poet, and mother,” Lorde fearlessly resisted White, heteronormative, patriarchal, hegemonic, and “pseudo-master” frameworks that were institutionally and structurally embedded within society. Lorde’s timeless, provocative, and even prophetic utterances continue to echo today and hold relevance within the theological academy. This dissertation builds upon Lorde’s powerful metaphor by arguing that twenty-first-century Protestant theological education in the United States is the “master’s house.” The master’s house must be dismantled because its core commitments—definitional, pedagogical, institutional, and curricular—are one-dimensionally oriented and Eurocentrically expressed. Specifically, this dissertation employs Critical Race Theory as a justice-oriented, methodological prism to expose various problems within the architectural and infrastructural frameworks of the master’s house. These issues include systemic racism, the prioritization of theory (science) over practice, the erasures or silencing of certain people, cultures, and histories, the presence of masculine civilizing ideals, language laced with ethnocentric, androcentric, and Eurocentric biases found in Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher’s nineteenth-century Brief Outline, “master scripts,” “racial paterfamilias spirits,” and “white ghosts of theological oppression,” as well as other persistent harms embedded in its curriculum that continue to influence theological education. Nevertheless, other problems persist. Studies from The Association of Theological Schools, the accrediting agency for theological schools in the United States and Canada, reveal that people of color will constitute the majority of students in theological education by 2040. Despite evidence of these demographic shifts, the ATS’s curriculum and other structural components of theological institutions lag behind this changing landscape, leaving them unprepared to engage with a multiracial society or confront the global issues it faces. Therefore, this dissertation’s thesis posits that the one-dimensionally oriented and Eurocentrically expressed curriculum governing the “master’s house” of twenty-first-century U.S. Protestant theological education must undergo a “curricular transformation” by adopting a model inspired by the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s vision for a “great world house,” focusing on the hopes and “pains in society” as the foundation for the “formal” curriculum, welcoming “an array of epistemologies and histories,” and embracing the D-E-I (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) in the Imago Dei while exploring how theological education can actively participate in genuinely shaping and improving the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it