MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114989939 · doi:10.34657/26763

Modellregion, Phase 1, Bio4MatPro - BL4-4: Bioinspirierte antimikrobielle Beschichtungen für Venenkatheter - AntiBacCat

2025· report· de· W7114989939 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTIB Repositorium · 2025
Typereport
Languagede
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDie (integrated circuit)Labrador RetrieverVolatile fatty acids

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Venenkatheter sind essenziell für die moderne Medizin, bergen jedoch ein hohes Risiko schwerwiegender Komplikationen. Bereits nach kurzer Liegedauer können selbst hochentwickelte Katheter die Blutgerinnung aktivieren, was zur Bildung von Thromben und Fibrinhüllen führt. Bisherige Ansätze setzen auf die Freisetzung antimikrobieller Wirkstoffe, stoßen jedoch an Grenzen: Blutbestandteile blockieren die Wirkstoffabgabe, wodurch die Schutzwirkung stark eingeschränkt wird. Ziel des Projekts ist die Entwicklung einer innovativen Nanobeschichtung mit „Kill & Repel“-Eigenschaften. Die Beschichtung verhindert die Anlagerung von Proteinen, Blutbestandteilen und Bakterien und tötet gleichzeitig Mikroorganismen bei direktem Kontakt. Sie basiert überwiegend auf hydrophilen Protein-Polymer-Hybriden, die irreversibel an die Katheteroberfläche physisorbieren und eine stabile, bürstenartige Barriere gegen Anhaftungen bilden (Repel). Ergänzend enthält sie einen geringen Anteil eines Protein-Endolysin-Hybrids. Endolysine sind hochspezialisierte antimikrobielle Enzyme, die die bakterielle Zellwand spalten und dadurch den Tod der Bakterien bewirken (Kill). Aufgrund ihrer evolutionären Selektion ist die Entstehung resistenter Stämme äußerst unwahrscheinlich.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTIB RepositoriumFrench-language works237,207