MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7114990092 · doi:10.26071/7bb5f2d7-b91e-46ce

Multibeam Bathymetry, Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler, and Sediment Core Data from the Pointe-des-Monts Underwater Canyon System, St. Lawrence Estuary

2025· dataset· en· W7114990092 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueOGSL repository · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of New BrunswickGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryCanyonSubmarine canyonSubmarine pipelineCurrent (fluid)Turbidity currentEstuaryAcoustic Doppler current profilerSubmarine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset includes multibeam bathymetric maps, time-evolution bathymetric profiles of submarine canyon slopes calculated from 3 different bathymetric maps (2015, 2020 and, 2022), downward Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler and CTD time series from October 2020 to Oct 2022, CTD profiles around Pointe-des-Monts, high resolution photography, radiography and laminography of short sediment cores, and magnetic susceptibility, D50 and sorting along each sediment core sampled offshore Pointe-des-Monts. The objective of this work is to determine the recurrence of turbidites observed in the short sediment cores in order to determine if they reflect turbidity current activity within the Pointe-des-Monts submarine canyon system. The second objective is to determine the influence of bottom currents on the sedimentary deposits record. This project was originally funded by Réseau Québec maritime (RQM) and Marine Environmental Observation, Prediction, and Response Network (MEOPAR).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOGSL repositoryFrench-language works237,207