84 Unseen and unheard: Medical student perspectives on interpreter use and the hidden curriculum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A growing number of Canadians are predominantly speaking a language other than English or French. When healthcare and health information is provided in a non-preferred language, adverse outcomes such as reduced understanding of medical information, poorer relationships with health care team members, and higher degrees of medical errors have been noted. A recent survey study across Canadian paediatric residency programs showed that while a variety of interpreter services are available across Canada, these remain underused by paediatric residents—even with awareness that clinical interactions in the absence of an interpreter are suboptimal. Experiences of how learners are taught and modelled to use interpreters have not been well described. Objectives Explore medical students' perceptions of interpreter use in clinical years. Investigate the potential influence of the hidden curriculum on medical students' decision-making regarding interpreter use. Design/Methods An interview guide was developed based on previous literature on medical students' experiences related to cultural humility and interpreter use, and REB approval was obtained. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 third- and fourth-year medical students at the University of British Columbia. Data analysis was iterative and thematic analysis was used to identify patterns across the dataset. Results Four key themes were identified from the data. The first was the tension between system efficiency versus patient-centred care, highlighting how time constraints and institutional pressures often led to the underutilization of interpreters, even when their use was acknowledged as vital for effective patient care. The theme of the trainee as resistor was also identified, where students described moments of pushing back against clinical norms that downplayed the need for interpreters. This was closely linked to the importance of role modelling, where the behaviour of attending physicians and senior residents either reinforced or diminished the perceived importance of using interpreters. Another significant theme was the awareness of a hierarchy of tasks, where responsibility for arranging and utilizing interpreters frequently fell to trainees, reinforcing the sense that interpreter services were of lower priority within the clinical hierarchy. Conclusion The hidden curriculum has a core role in shaping students' behaviours regarding interpreter use. To improve systemic use of interpreters, it is imperative to address both the hidden curriculum and structural barriers presented to trainees. Direct teaching and improved role-modelling behaviours can help counteract the implicit messages conveyed within the hidden curriculum, and ultimately improve care for patients with limited English/French proficiency
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".