Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este working paper propone una aproximación conceptual al denominado “Factor P”, entendido como un componente estructural de la Economía Social y Solidaria vinculado a la confianza, la reciprocidad y la producción social de valor fuera de los circuitos monetarios tradicionales. A partir de la experiencia histórica de la Red Global de Trueque (RGT) en Argentina y América Latina, el trabajo articula análisis teórico y memoria situada para explorar cómo los sistemas de intercambio multirrecíproco operan como dispositivos de resiliencia territorial frente a crisis económicas, exclusión financiera y procesos de neutralización político-judicial en contextos democráticos. El texto recupera trayectorias organizativas, tensiones institucionales y aprendizajes acumulados durante más de tres décadas de práctica, proponiendo al Factor P como una categoría analítica útil para comprender dinámicas económicas no hegemónicas, procesos de autogestión comunitaria y formas alternativas de organización social. Este documento se inscribe en el campo de la investigación independiente en Economía Social y Solidaria, con énfasis en enfoques latinoamericanos, metodologías basadas en la experiencia y perspectivas críticas sobre desarrollo, poder y democracia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.035 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".