Inference-time editing and guidance methods using diffusion-based generative models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores the efficient and effective editing and guidance algorithms of diffusion-based generative models across three distinct tasks: prompt-based video editing, offline model-based design optimization and conditional image generation. First, we propose FastVideoEdit, an efficient zero-shot text-to-video editing method leveraging consistency models to bypass computational bottlenecks of typical editing pipelines. By directly mapping source videos to edited output, while preserving visual fidelity and temporal coherence, significantly reducing running time. Second, we present DEMO, a two-phase editing approach for offline model-based optimization. DEMO first generates high-performing candidates via gradient ascent on a surrogate model, then calibrates these designs with a learned diffusion prior to overcome out-of-distribution (OOD) issues and ensure realism and distributional validity of generated samples. Lastly, we introduce ADMMDiff, a novel training-free conditional diffusion framework that decouples unconditional generation and guidance via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM), achieving superior performance across multiple tasks including image generation with nonlinear guidance, linear inverse problems, and controllable motion synthesis. Together, these works demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of diffusion models in enabling efficient editing, trustworthy optimization, and controllable generation, advancing the frontiers of generative modeling in computer vision and optimization
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".