MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115030175

Inference-time editing and guidance methods using diffusion-based generative models

2025· dissertation· en· W7115030175 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Generative grammarGenerative modelProcess (computing)Frame (networking)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores the efficient and effective editing and guidance algorithms of diffusion-based generative models across three distinct tasks: prompt-based video editing, offline model-based design optimization and conditional image generation. First, we propose FastVideoEdit, an efficient zero-shot text-to-video editing method leveraging consistency models to bypass computational bottlenecks of typical editing pipelines. By directly mapping source videos to edited output, while preserving visual fidelity and temporal coherence, significantly reducing running time. Second, we present DEMO, a two-phase editing approach for offline model-based optimization. DEMO first generates high-performing candidates via gradient ascent on a surrogate model, then calibrates these designs with a learned diffusion prior to overcome out-of-distribution (OOD) issues and ensure realism and distributional validity of generated samples. Lastly, we introduce ADMMDiff, a novel training-free conditional diffusion framework that decouples unconditional generation and guidance via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM), achieving superior performance across multiple tasks including image generation with nonlinear guidance, linear inverse problems, and controllable motion synthesis. Together, these works demonstrate the versatility and effectiveness of diffusion models in enabling efficient editing, trustworthy optimization, and controllable generation, advancing the frontiers of generative modeling in computer vision and optimization

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207