MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115030722

Synthesizing specialized sparse tensor accelerators for reconfigurable hardware using high-level functional abstractions

2025· dissertation· en· W7115030722 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurable computingSoftwareTensor (intrinsic definition)Field-programmable gate arrayHardware acceleration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sparsity is inherent in many applications such as machine learning and graph analytics.However, achieving high efficiency in sparse computations requires specialized hardware accelerators like FPGAs, as traditional accelerators like CPUs and GPUs typically cater to dense data.While high level synthesis enables the automatic generation of FPGA-based accelerators, generic solutions produced via C-based synthesis flows often demand extensive development time, leading designers to prioritize broad applicability over fine-grained structural specialization.Consequently, these accelerators fail to fully exploit FPGA's reconfigurability, leaving substantial performance and efficiency gains untapped.This thesis pushes the boundary by automatically generating specialized accelerators that match a given fixed sparse-structure (e.g., in static graph analytics and pruned neural networks).It accomplishes this by adapting a functional, type-driven compilation methodology previously shown to be highly effective at producing high-performance GPU code for sparse tensor algebra.By reimagining this approach for reconfigurable hardware, the thesis introduces specialized primitives designed specifically for irregular data.Encoding tensor shapes directly within the type system allows concise specifications of sparse accelerators and facilitates advanced optimizations, such as dynamic partitioning and vector sharding, ultimately generating hardware precisely customized to the sparsity patterns of the underlying tensors.Compared to state-of-the-art generic accelerators (HiSparse, HiSpMV and GraphLily), the approach achieves up to a 2.8× improvement in bandwidth efficiency for sparse matrix i

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207