MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115032500

Coxeter cell complexes and the parallel wall theorem

2025· dissertation· en· W7115032500 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
KeywordsCoxeter groupPoint (geometry)Type (biology)Algebra over a field
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous développons la théorie des complexes cellulaires Coxeter CAT(0), généralisant les complexes de cubes CAT(0) et le complexe de Davis d'un groupe de Coxeter.Nous montrons que la structure combinatoire d'un complexe cellulaire Coxeter CAT(0) est aussi gouvernée par ses murs.En analysant les angles entre les murs, nous donnons une nouvelle preuve du Théorème des Murs Parallèles pour les groupes de Coxeter finiment générés.Finalement, nous prouvons le Théorème des Murs Parallèles pour les complexes cellulaires Coxeter CAT(0) 2-dimensionnels avec un nombre fini de formes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207