The cultural Cold War at Expo 67 or: how I learned to stop worrying and love Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Exposition universelle de 1967, surnommé Expo 67, a été l'un des meilleurs moments pour le Canada de se présenter sur la scène internationale pendant la guerre froide. Cependant, en 1967, le Canada était un pays divisé, en pleine recherche d'une identité nationale claire. Trois récits contradictoires apparaissent lorsqu'on analyse les messages présentés au pavillon canadien, au pavillon québécois et au pavillon des Indiens du Canada, créé par les Autochtones. La guerre froide en cours a affecté les messages des trois pavillons. L'histoire de chaque pavillon a également été complétée, remise en question et élargie par les deux autres. En conséquence, les touristes de l'Expo ont acquis une compréhension étonnamment complète de la culture canadienne, même si cette compréhension ne leur a pas permis d'obtenir des réponses simples
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.045 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".