MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115036108

Design of a conductive metal–organic framework based on a TTF-inspired Ligand

2025· dissertation· en· W7115036108 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsQuébec Science (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical conductorLigand (biochemistry)Context (archaeology)Key (lock)Copper
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis presents the design of novel sulphur-metal linked conductive metal-organic frameworks (c-MOFs) based on a tetrathiafulvalene (TTF)-inspired ligand, 2,4,6-tris(4,5-disulfanyl-1,3-dithiol-2-ylidene)-1,3,5-cyclohexanetrione (TDCT). TDCT was chosen due to its planar π-conjugated structure, reversible redox activity, narrow electrochemical bandgap (1.27 eV), non-integer oxidation state, and the precedence of high conductivity in related TTF and dithiolene systems. The combination of conductivity and porosity in c-MOF enables various applications, such as electrocatalysis, energy storage and sensing.To verify the feasibility of the synthesis of c-MOF based on TDCT ligands, we first synthesized molecular complexes modelling the structure of the target c-MOFs, [Ni(4Bu-TDCT)₂]2-(Bu4N+)2 and [Zn(4Bu-TDCT)₂]2–(Bu4N+)2. Cyanoethyl protecting groups were introduced onto the ligand molecules to obtain air-stable derivatives. Following in-situ deprotection and coordination with metal ions, the resulting complexes were obtained as dark orange and dark green solids. Their structures were established via NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The ¹³C NMR spectrum of the Ni complex showed no signals for carbon atoms located in proximity (within eight bonds) of the metal center. This is attributed to paramagnetic broadening owed to the presence of the oxidized radical anion species [Ni(4Bu-TDCT)₂]•-. Integration of the S–CH₂ and N–CH₂ proton signals confirmed the presence of a mixed-valence state in the nickel complex, showing its non-stoichiometric nature as [Ni(4Bu-TDCT)₂]1.37–(Bu4N+)1.37. In contrast, the Zn complex revealed the expected stoichiometric ratio [Zn(4Bu-TDCT)₂]2–(Bu4N+)2 and did not show any paramagnetic broadening in its NMR.The Ni complex in CDCl3 solution also exhibited a strong Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) signal, while the Zn complex was EPR silent. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) revealed a highly electron-rich nature of [Ni(4Bu-TDCT)₂], which undergoes a reversible oxidation at a very low potential E1/2 = –0.69 V vs. Fc/Fc⁺, suggesting facile oxidation by oxygen in the air. In contrast, the oxidation potential of Zn complex was higher (E1/2 = -0.21 V vs. Fc/Fc⁺), explaining its greater air stability.Both complexes also showed reversible two-electron reduction waves (one electron per ligand). The electrochemically determined HOMO-LUMO gaps (1.27 eV and 1.76eV) are very close to their optical gaps, Eg =1.28 eV for Ni and 1.76 eV for Zn. Guided by these results, we explored the synthesis of a two-dimensional c-MOF, Ni₃(TDCT)₂, via a similar deprotection strategy from hexa(2-cyanoethyl)-TDCT precursor. The reaction is limited by the oxidative instability of the hexaanionic TDCT intermediate, and we explored several strategies to minimize the oxidative side reactions. We have the preliminary investigations showing partial crystallinity observed in the WAXS of the c-MOF. The electrical conductivity of 10-3 S/cm was measured in compressed pellets by a two-probe technique. This work establishes a new TTF-derived platform of ligand for conductive framework development and underscores the importance as well as the challenges of redox-active linkers in the design of c-MOFs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications→French-language works237,207→