MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7115037150

Development of geometrical parameters to describe anatomical changes and predict the need for radiotherapy replanning in head and neck cancer patients

2024· dissertation· en· W7115037150 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neck cancerRadiation therapyHead and neckCancerComputed tomography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy may experience significant anatomical changes due to weight loss and tumor shrinkage. These changes can impact the effectiveness of the initial treatment plan, potentially necessitating treatment replanning. However, ad hoc replanning requires additional clinical staff time, which can lead to suboptimal and stressful treatment planning. This interruption in workflow can impact many patients. Furthermore, there is currently no established method for determining the total amount of anatomical variation in the head and neck region to decide whether replanning is necessary.This thesis project aimed to identify and create metrics based on patient anatomical structures, that can describe the anatomical alterations that patients may experience over the course of the treatment, and influence decisions regarding treatment replanning. These parameters were used in the development of a machine learning classification model to predict if and when patients should undergo replanning. This model accounts for the progression of the information over time, which will be achieved with the creation of an automatic extraction pipeline.This study included 120 head and neck cancer patients treated at the McGill University Health Centre. Based on the 3D shape and 2D contours of radiotherapy structures, we defined 43 parameters, such as the average or Chamfer distance, to describe body shrinkage. We calculated the rate of change of these parameters across fractions through linear regression analysis and obtained the variation of each parameter with respect to initial values both analyses provided significant insights for evaluating replanning. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis, which revealed significant differences between replanned and non-replanned patients as early as fraction 4 in the case of rate of changes, indicating the potential for early prediction. Specific fraction machine learning models for fractions 5, 10, and 15 were built using the parameters, clinical data, and feature selection techniques. To estimate the performance of the models, the repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation resampling technique was used with the Area Under Curve (AUC) as a performance metric. The best multivariate models for fractions 5, 10, and 15 yielded a training AUC score of 0.86 [0.65 - 1.00], 0.87 [0.71 - 1.00], and 0.92 [0.78 - 1.00], respectively. When testing the models in a hold-out set of patients, each showed AUC values of 0.82, 0.83, and 0.79. The developed machine learning models based on information from radiotherapy structures demonstrate the ability of early identification of patients who may need replanning, which if implemented, will enhance patient outcomes, streamline clinical workflows, and reduce costs in radiotherapy treatments. However, further analysis needs to be done to overcome false positive and negative cases

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MIND→Same topicHead and Neck Cancer Studies→French-language works237,207→