MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115039004

Predictive models and biomarkers for early stage and oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, using machine learning

2024· dissertation· en· W7115039004 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJewish General Hospital
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)Lung cancerRadiation therapySABR volatility modelCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is currently the alternative for inoperable early-stage and oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, a minority of patients are not good responders. Even though physicians use clinical variables and semantic radiological features to make treatment decisions, medical images contain a wealth of personalized pathophysiological information that can be extracted and used for clinical decision support systems. Indeed, radiomic features can be used to generate predictive algorithms and biomarkers that can determine treatment outcomes and stratify patients to their therapeutic options. Additionally, while some features have shown predictive potential for SBRT-treated NSCLC tumors, radiomics features are not always stable. Thus, validating predictive biomarkers for applications in our institution is important. This study investigated the radiomic features of images and the clinical parameters obtained from early-stage and oligometastatic NSCLC patients who underwent SBRT, to predict different response outcomes. A single-institution retrospective review of patients’ medical records (n = 98 patients; median age = 76 years; male/female ratio = 46/52; 116 lesions treated with SBRT from 2009 to 2022) was conducted. The radiomics features (107 features) extracted from CT planning scans with PyRadiomics, along with the patients’ clinical data were collected. The response to SBRT was analyzed from follow-up scans. The local response was defined as per RECIST criteria. The regional progression was defined as the appearance of new tumors and the worsening of the disease across other regions of the lung. Distant progression was defined as the spreading of disease outside the lung. The adaptive synthetic (ADASYN) sampling method corrected the imbalance in responses. Classification models, which included support vector machine (SVM) with linear or radial basis function (RBF) kernels, random forest, adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) and multi-layer perceptron (MLP), were used. Models were trained using a 5-fold cross-validation scheme. Their performances were measured with the areas under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots on the validation folds. Using permutation feature importance, predictive biomarkers were identified.Highly performing models were generated for the prediction of local response and distant progression; respectively, the best models had AUCs of 0.94+/-0.05 and 0.98+/-0.02. When oligometastatic patients were omitted, the best models for local response (AUC: 0.95+/-0.06) and distant progression (AUC: 0.99+/-0.0) were as predictive. For local response models, the treatment site and the performance status, along with radiomic features such as first-order root-mean-squared-intensity, first-order skewness and GLSZM gray-level-non-uniformity, emerged as predictive. For distant progression models, clinical variables including the treatment site, the initial staging and the performance status were predictive. The predictive models created, and the biomarkers identified could be used in clinical support decision systems. Indeed, these tools could spare the minority of patients who do not benefit from SBRT, thus helping physicians to adjust their patients’ treatment course. Furthermore, consistent with previous research, root-mean-squared-intensity and skewness were found to be predictive radiomic biomarkers. By validating these features with our cohort, we showed the features’ ability to maintain their predictive capabilities in an external setting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207