MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115061714 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17922341

Illidops bellicosus

2025· article· W7115061714 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsCNIB Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeAntenna (radio)Key (lock)Host (biology)Artifact (error)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illidops bellicosus (Papp, 1977) Fig. 9 Apanteles bellicosus Papp, 1977: 222–224, figs 8–10. Type material Holotype (photos examined) MONGOLIA – Ömnögovi Province • ♀; “Südgobi aimak”, Bayandalai District, 14 km SE of Somon Bajandalaj; 1450 m a.s.l.; 15 Jun. 1967; no. 803; HNHM; typ. no. 2394. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of habitus photos of the holotype and the information available in Papp (1977, 1981), and Kotenko (2007) → **. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Mongolia. Molecular data No molecular data available. Remarks The holotype of this species shows a distinct contrast in antenna coloration with the antenna being mostly darker brown to black but the first flagellomere being entirely light brown to yellow (“pale”). However, the starker contrast may potentially be an artifact of long preservation as Papp described the following: “Antenna brown to blackish, first flagellar joint more or less reddish” (Papp 1977: 223). Illidops bellicosus (Papp, 1977) is one of the species which challenge our concept of Illidops with its entirely smooth propodeum. However, it has a very short fore wing vein R1 and based on the information available to us we could not draw any conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207