Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops toreicus Kotenko, 2007 Fig. 57 Illidops toreicus Kotenko, 2007: 178–179, pl. 79 figs 1–2, pl. 80 fig. 23. Type material Holotype RUSSIA – [Zabaykalsky Krai] • ♀; [Ononsky District], Chitinsk Province, Daurskiy Nature Reserve, north side of Zun-Torey Lake, tract Irel’zhin; [50.23° N, 115.78° E]; [738 m]; gully; 7 Jul. 1990; A. Kotenko leg.; SIZK. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of photos of the holotype and the information available in Kotenko (2007). → ***. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Russia (ZAB). Molecular data No molecular data available. Original description sensu Kotenko (2007) (translated from Russian and with updated morphological terminology and comments in brackets when our observations did not match Kotenko’s) [Diagnosis: Similar to I. kostjuki, but differs in the following characters:] T2 wider, width ~3 × central length. T2 1.5× shorter than T3, posterior margin weakly arcuately curved. Ovipositor sheaths shorter, about 0.5× metatibia length. Pterostigma uniformly colored, dark brown. Fore wing vein R1 2.3–2.5 × longer than the distance from it to apex of 3 RS. Anteromesoscutum with less noticeable setae and denser punctation, mostly matte, posteriorly with smooth sheen. Smaller: 2.5 [mm]. Head 1.7× as wide as long, slightly narrower than mesosoma width, roundly narrowed behind eyes. Gena 1.5 × shorter than the eye width (laterally). Ocelli in obtuse triangle [ocelli in low triangle], its base 1.9– 2.0× as long as OOL [POL 1.2× OOL]. POL 1.4× greater than OD [POL 2.2× OD]. Tangent to anterior edge of the posterior ocelli crossing posterior edge of the front ocellus [imaginary tangent posterior to the anterior ocellus touches the posterior ocelli]. Eyes noticeably converging downwards, their longitudinal diameter 1.7 × the transverse diameter and 1.6× the height of the face. Upper width of face 1.2 × more than the lower width, and 1.6× its height. Front margin of the clypeus convex, its height 3.2× less than face height. Gena height 3.7× shorter than longitudinal eye diameter. Antenna slightly longer than body, F15 length 1.3× its width. Mesosoma barely shorter than metasoma. Mesosoma length 1.6× more than its height. Fore wing 1.2× as long as hind wing, and slightly shorter than body. Pterostigma 2.6× as long as wide, slightly shorter than vein R1. Vein r slightly shorter than 2 RS. Vein 1cu-a arising at around middle of the 1st discal cell length; hind wing vein cu-a almost straight; metafemur length 3.2–3.3 × its width and 1.3× less than the length of the metatibia. Metatarsus 1.2× as long as metatibia, Ratio of holotype metatarsomere lengths as follows 3.5:1.9:1.4:1.0:1.2. T1 slightly widened posteriorly, 1.3 × longer than maximum width. Sculpture. Head dorsally, clypeus and frontal part of gena (narrow stripe behind eyes) with sparser punctures, more or less shiny. Face and posterior side of gena densely punctured, matte. Scutoscutellar suture narrow, crenulated. Scutellum with punctation less dense than mesoscutum, shiny. Propodeum, T1, T2 densely and softly wrinkled (except for posterior part of propodeum), matte. Metacoxa densely punctated apically, matte, their outer side more sparsely punctured, with satin sheen. Coloration. Body black. Antennae almost black. Palps and tibial spurs yellowish. Tegulae, R1 and most veins in the middle of the fore wing dark brown. Wings slightly smoky. Legs mostly black. Apices of the front and middle femorae and all of tibiae reddish-brown, apex of metatibia and all tarsi slightly darkened. Holotype – ♀, Chit. [Chitinsky District, Zabaykalsky Krai, Russia], Daursky Reserve, N [orth] shore of Lake Zun-Torey, tract Irel’zhin, beam, 7.VII 1990 (A.K.) [SIZK].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".