Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops cloelia (Nixon, 1965) Fig. 16 Apanteles cloelia Nixon, 1965: 183–184, fig. 211. Other material examined GERMANY – Bavaria • 1 ♀; Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Zugspitze, Platt; 47.407° N, 11.008° E; 2005 m a.s.l.; 18 Jul.–2 Aug. 2018; D. Doczkal and J. Voith leg.; Malaise trap; bulk ID: dv.zugsp5.3; obere Grenze Latschengebüsch, kleinräumiges Mosaik mit Zwergstrauchheide und (sub-)alpinen Rasen; SNSB-ZSM, ZSM-HYM-42389-G08. Species concept The type was examined by Fernandez-Triana et al. (2020). Our species concept is based on the information available in Nixon (1965, 1976) and Papp (1981) and the specimens we identified as this species based on morphology, including their associated molecular data. This species is morphologically rather unique → **. Ecology / host information Host unknown. Distribution PAL: Austria, Germany, Hungary, Korea, Russia (E, NC), Slovakia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, former Yugoslavia. Molecular data Molecular data: BOLD:AEO8223. Remarks Holotype female, NHMUK. Country of type locality: Switzerland. For more details see Höcherl et al. (2024). A male specimen of I. cloelia identified by Nixon should be stored at SNSB-ZSM as part of the Haeselbarth collection; however we were unable to locate or examine it as the collection underwent construction during the time of this project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".