MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

INTEGRATION OF MORAL AND ETHICAL VALUES INTO THE CONTENT OF HISTORICAL EDUCATION

2025· article· W7115070363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademic Notes Series Pedagogical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianCurriculumHistorical thinkingCitizenshipSocial studiesInclusion (mineral)Global citizenshipDemocracyValues education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents a comprehensive pedagogical study on the integration of moral and ethical values into the content of history education at the university level. It emphasizes that historical education performs not only a cognitive but also an educational function, forming in students a system of moral guidelines, civic consciousness, critical thinking skills, and a sense of social responsibility. The necessity of strengthening the axiological component of historical disciplines is substantiated through the inclusion of key concepts such as “justice,” “dignity,” “tolerance,” “responsibility,” “peace,” and “humanism.” Based on the analysis of Ukrainian educational policy documents (History of Ukraine curriculum 2025, World History curriculum 2023, and the integrated 5–9 grade program 2017), the study demonstrates that modern Ukrainian historical education aims to develop value-based orientations and competencies necessary for life in a democratic society. These programs introduce cross-cutting lines such as “Values and Morality” and “Civic Responsibility,” which combine factual knowledge with the cultivation of ethical beliefs and civic engagement. A comparative analysis of Ukrainian and international experience shows that foreign standards–particularly those of the United Kingdom, Canada, and the Council of Europe–systematically integrate moral and ethical components into history education. These models emphasize the development of empathy, tolerance, respect for human rights, understanding of historical diversity, and the ability to assess events through ethical lenses. Special attention is given to UNESCO’s Global Citizenship and Peace Education initiative, which encourages educational systems to foster global citizenship, peacebuilding, and intercultural dialogue. The results confirm that integrating moral and ethical values into history education ensures the development of well-rounded individuals capable of critical reflection, social responsibility, and conscious action in society. The article concludes that further development of Ukrainian historical education should include improving teaching methodologies, creating value-centered curricula, and enhancing the ethical competence of future educators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.014
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.303
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it