Bibliographic record
Abstract
Illidops scutellaris (Muesebeck, 1921) Figs 2A, 38–40 Apanteles scutellaris Muesebeck, 1921: 533–534. Type material Paratypes UNITED STATES – California • 1 ♂; Pasadena; J.E. Graf leg.; Muesebeck det.; ex. Phthorimaea operculella; CNC, CNCHYM 00212. – Florida • 1 ♀; Palm Beach County, Belle Glade; 30 May 1944; N. Hayslip leg.; “reared from potatoes”; CNC, CNCHYM 00213. Other material examined CANADA – Yukon Territory • 2 ♀♀; Champagne; 60.790° N, 136.437° W; 733 m a.s.l.; 8 Jul. 2006; H. Goulet and C. Boudreault leg.; CNC, HYM00000588, HYM00000627 • 1 ♀; Tahkini River road; 60.875° N, 135.386° W; 693 m a.s.l.; 6 Jul. 2006; H. Goulet and C. Boudreault leg.; CNC, HYM00000560. Species concept Our species concept is based on our examination of habitus photos of the holotype (available via the Smithsonian Website), our examination of authoritatively identified and reared specimens stored in the CNC, and the information available in Muesebeck (1921) and Tobias & Kotenko (1986) → ***. Ecology / host information Type series (including holotype) reared ex Gelechiidae: Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller, 1873). Distribution AUS: Hawaiian Islands; NEA: United States (AZ, CA, FL, TX); NEO: Mexico; PAL: Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Iran. Molecular data BOLD:AAA8769. Remarks Holotype female, USNM. Country of type locality: United States. The type was examined. In the original description, the type is reported to have been reared from Phthorimaea operculella by J.E. Graf in California, together with four females and three males (Muesebeck 1921). Mason had this species available in his collection and considered it to be part of Apanteles, rather than Illidops (Mason 1981). Papp (1981) and Tobias & Kotenko (1986) listed it in the butalidis group and Papp (1988) transferred it to Illidops. This species fits well in our concept of Illidops.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".