THE ROLE OF CUSTOMISED AND RITUAL PRACTICES IN THE PROCESS OF CHILDREN’S INTEGRATION INTO THE COMMUNITY OF UKRAINIANS IN THE 19TH – FIRST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the publication, when covering the issue of integration of children into rural society using customary ritual practice, the author proceed from the following principles: the ideological foundations of the traditional culture of Ukrainians of the 19th – the first quarter of the 20th centuries were based on a complex of beliefs and ideas of the Christian religion and the principles of the magical consciousness of paganism; the functional factor remained elements of archaic consciousness as immanent components of the worldview system of the times of the Indo-European community. The ritual was used as a regulatory paradigm in traditional culture that was based on the idea of the cyclical nature of time. The complex of folk custom-ritual culture clearly defined and symbolized the boundaries of children’s lives, noting the passage of a child at a certain stage on the path of their growing up. Reaching the age of one was a significant moment in a child’s life. The significance of this age limit in the folk pedagogy of Ukrainians was manifested in the removal of certain old rules and the emergence of new prohibitions and regulations. From 1 to 3–4 years old, the child experienced a new stage in his life, during which he entered the «world of culture», and with it, some changes in everyday and ritual attitudes towards him were also associated. The next important transitional stage in the life of children was the age of 7, which was associated in folk pedagogy of Ukrainians with a new change in their status positions. The inclusion of them in the family’s active work resulted in this happening. The article centers on the subject of socialization, which has a direct impact on the child’s incorporation into rural society. Parents played a key role in this process. Furthermore, grandparents played a significant role in the process of socialization and enculturation of the child. The oldest generation primarily acted as agents of indirect transmission of ethnocultural values. From the age of six to seven, the child increasingly began to communicate with older children. This category of socializers ensured that the child mastered social experience and cultural traditions when communicating with their peers. One of the forms of socialization for the younger generation through the community, the fellow villagers was the institute of admission. Godparents acted as intermediaries and mediators of the community in the process of socializing the child. It was the institution of nepotism that the community was responsible for further socializing the child.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".