MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115175958 · doi:10.1515/pac-2025-0595

Surface morphological and optoelectrical characteristics of silicon nitride featured with magnesium oxide nano coating

2025· article· en· W7115175958 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePure and Applied Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon and Solar Cell Technologies
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivationPhotocurrentSilicon nitrideSolar cellEnergy conversion efficiencyMagnesiumChemical vapor depositionSiliconNitride

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ) solar cell is well-known for its use in solar energy applications due to its passivation properties, which minimize surface recombination, improve thermal stability, and enhance chemical resistance. However, Si 3 N 4 is found to increase processing complexity due to uneven particle dispersion, and a higher concentration of Si 3 N 4 leads to microcracks in areas of high stress concentration, which limit the optoelectrical properties. This research aims to overcome processing difficulties and to enrich the functional characteristics of Si 3 N 4 solar cells with 20, 30, and 40 nm of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanocoating via a vacuum-assisted chemical vapour deposition (CVD) process. The effects of MgO and vacuum on the surface morphology during the CVD process were analyzed, revealing a fine-grain structure without microcracks, resulting in enhanced optoelectrical properties compared to those of the monolithic Si 3 N 4 solar cell. Likewise, X-ray diffraction analysis confirms the presence of MgO in Si 3 N 4 and its crystalline size. Furthermore, the Si 3 N 4 layer with 40 nm MgO is found to have an optimum drain current density of 2.8 × 10 −3 A, an improved photocurrent density of 2.6 mA/cm 2 , a reduced transmittance of 58 %, and a superior solar conversion efficiency of 24.1 %. It is suitable for thin-film solar cell applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePure and Applied ChemistrySame topicSilicon and Solar Cell TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207