MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115177521 · doi:10.36548/jiip.2025.4.019

Pneumonia Detection Enhanced by Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks cGAN Addressing Class Imbalance with High Quality Synthetic Data

2025· article· W7115177521 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Innovative Image Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynthetic dataGenerative grammarClass (philosophy)Adversarial systemProcess (computing)Sensitivity (control systems)PneumoniaTraining set

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pneumonia has recently reported the highest number of deaths in the entire world. Consequently, diagnostic procedures ought to be precise. Conversely, the problem of class imbalance is a universal issue in medical image classification that may result in biased models that do not perform well in underrepresented classes. The issue of class disproportion is successfully addressed in the work under consideration, as a cGAN generates high-quality synthetic images of the minor classes, allowing for the creation of a balanced dataset that, in turn, leads to high sensitivity of the model and consequently improves its overall performance. This paper presents a new Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) architecture to improve the detection of pneumonia in the provided chest X-rays. To mitigate the issue of data imbalance in the dataset, this work suggests a conditional GAN-based augmentation process for synthetic X-ray images by producing clinically viable and label-coherent synthetic X-ray images. The framework also includes validation achieved through the application of either SSIM/FID or balanced training, which improves the accuracy of pneumonia detection and leads to diagnostic conclusions unlike those of existing methods. Current approaches are less successful compared to this study, as the system achieves 96.5% accuracy, 95.2% sensitivity, and 96.1% specificity, with a high F1 score. The suggested framework has a good performance scale, making it applicable in medical applications. This paper demonstrates the capacity of cGAN to develop pneumonia diagnosis machines that are feasible and user-friendly in healthcare institutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Innovative Image ProcessingSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207