MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115180572 · doi:10.5194/os-21-3507-2025

The North Atlantic mean state in mesoscale eddy-resolving coupled models: a multimodel study

2025· article· en· W7115180572 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOcean science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and MobilityMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsMesoscale meteorologyStratification (seeds)Gulf StreamCoupled model intercomparison projectClimate modelTemperature salinity diagramsOcean currentEnsemble averageOcean dynamicsNorth Atlantic oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Ocean mesoscale structures, which are parameterized in models with standard resolutions on the order of 1° or coarser, have an impact at larger scales, affecting the ocean mean state and circulation. Here we study the effects of increasing model ocean resolution to mesoscale eddy-resolving scales on the representation of the North Atlantic mean state, by comparing an ensemble of four HighResMIP coupled historical simulations with nominal ocean resolutions of at least 1/10° – corresponding to the models CESM1-CAM5-SE-HR, EC-Earth3P-VHR, HadGEM3-GC31-HH, and MPI-ESM1-2-ER – to a baseline of 39 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) simulations at coarser resolution. We find an improved representation of the Gulf Stream (GS) structure and position in the mesoscale-resolving ensemble, which leads to significantly reduced surface temperature and salinity biases north of Cape Hatteras (NCH). While higher resolution lessens the mean cold–fresh surface biases in the Central North Atlantic (CNA), the improvement is not statistically significant, as some mesoscale-resolving models still present an overly weak North Atlantic Current (NAC). Important differences also occur in the Labrador (LS) and western Irminger Seas (IS). Although the mesoscale-resolving ensemble exhibits larger warm and salty local biases at the surface compared to the low-resolution one, its full-depth profile reveals significantly weaker vertical stratification in the area, closer to observations. This reduced stratification in the high-resolution ensemble is consistent with the presence of stronger (although not significantly stronger) deep water convection in the region. While in the LS the wide range of MLD observational estimates makes model assessment challenging, in the Nordic Seas and along the East Greenland Current, convection in the high-resolution model ensemble is in better agreement with observational records, compared to the low-resolution ensemble. Another clear improvement in the mesoscale-resolving ensemble is found for the representation of the Atlantic overturning in depth-space, which is significantly closer to RAPID observations at 26.5° N than in the low-resolution counterpart; however, it still remains too shallow compared to observations and reanalyses. The subpolar gyre (SPG), as characterized by the barotropic streamfunction, is not significantly stronger in the higher resolution ensemble, although it presents a narrower and locally stronger boundary current.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOcean scienceSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207