Whip Pommel from Bakla Hillfort (Southwestern Crimea)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study, dedicated to the analysis of archaeological data that provide arguments for establishing the chronology of the destruction of the Bakla settlement in the 13th century, aims to identify traces of interaction between the sedentary and nomadic populations of the Southwestern Crimea during this period. Within the framework of the research, one of the most significant events in the medieval history of the Crimea is examined – the destruction of Southwestern Taurica, including Bakla, as a result of nomadic raids in the third quarter of the 13th century. Particular attention is given to a rare find documented in the fire layer at the Bakla settlement – a whip pommel characteristic of nomadic cultures. This pommel, featuring a lateral beak-shaped projection, is classified as Type III according to A.N. Kirpichnikov's typology. The find may indicate the violent nature of Bakla’s destruction, helping to refine the historical reconstruction of events during this period. The study also addresses the issue of cultural interactions between the sedentary Byzantine population and nomadic groups, whose influence is scarcely reflected in the material culture. Based on stratigraphic analysis and the comparison of archaeological complexes, it is concluded that the fire layer of the third quarter of the 13th century belongs to the general horizon of destruction observed in the Byzantine centers of Southwestern Taurica, including Cherson and Eski-Kermen. The obtained data emphasize the need for further publication and systematization of materials from the excavations at Bakla, which will make it possible to refine the chronology of the site’s existence and to clarify its place within the historical context of the region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".