MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115185676 · doi:10.4000/15chh

Steffie Van Neste. Alexandre Dumas ou la curiosité moderne.

2025· article· pt· W7115185676 on OpenAlexaffvenue

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Relation (database)Subject (documents)Feature (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1Le travail de Steffie Van Neste repose sur le constat suivant : si la curiosit au coeur de l'criture d'Alexandre Dumas pre a t souvent remarque [,] personne n'a explor ce thme dans toute son tendue (26).Cherchant combler cette lacune fondamentale, l'ouvrage est compos de trois parties - La curiosit savante , La curiosit hermneutique et La curiosit publique -qui explorent trois types de curiosit qui dominent au XIX e sicle (28), chacune au moyen de trois chapitres.Si des prcisions supplmentaires sur ces types de curiosit organisant le propos auraient t utiles ds l'introduction, la structure de l'ouvrage a t soigne et celui-ci adopte une approche pdagogique qui rend la dmonstration trs efficace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207