MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115190504 · doi:10.5194/ica-abs-10-217-2025

Mapping the Strata of the Strasbourg-Kehl Border

2025· article· en· W7115190504 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts of the ICA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of WindsorYork University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversité de StrasbourgYork UniversityUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsPoliticsTreatyLegislationSpace (punctuation)DominionUnit (ring theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In October 2023, as part of the conference Borders in the English-Speaking World: Mapping & Counter-Mapping, two artist-researcher collectives (the Hamilton Perambulatory Unit or HPU, and In/Terminus) held a "walkshop" across the Rhine River, the border between Strasbourg, France, and Kehl, Germany.In her introduction to the workbook of maps and prompts given to each participant, Gwen Cressman, co-organizer of the conference, writes thusly about this border: Moving and complex, the border between Kehl and Strasbourg has changed national affiliations twelve times since Louis XIV conquered Strasbourg in 1681.Whereas the space is marked by successive wars and frequent political change, Karen Denni also shows that border practices and the human relations it entails have been slower to evolve (Denni, 2012).Despite the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957, which initiated the construction of a political and economic Europe, it would take many years for the project to overcome the borders that history had erected between France and Germany.Efforts to erase the border have recently culminated with the inauguration of the Passerelle des Deux Rives in 2004, the effective disappearance of the border post on the Pont de l'Europe in 2009, and the re-establishment of the streetcar line from the center of Strasbourg to Kehl in 2017, 73 years after its closure at the end of the Second World War.While there are no physical obstacles to the crossing of the Rhine, differences in language, signage, architecture, legislation and lifestyles continue to exert "their separating effects."(Denni, 23)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts of the ICASame topicCross-Border Cooperation and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207