Mapping the Strata of the Strasbourg-Kehl Border
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In October 2023, as part of the conference Borders in the English-Speaking World: Mapping & Counter-Mapping, two artist-researcher collectives (the Hamilton Perambulatory Unit or HPU, and In/Terminus) held a "walkshop" across the Rhine River, the border between Strasbourg, France, and Kehl, Germany.In her introduction to the workbook of maps and prompts given to each participant, Gwen Cressman, co-organizer of the conference, writes thusly about this border:Moving and complex, the border between Kehl and Strasbourg has changed national affiliations twelve times since Louis XIV conquered Strasbourg in 1681.Whereas the space is marked by successive wars and frequent political change, Karen Denni also shows that border practices and the human relations it entails have been slower to evolve (Denni, 2012).Despite the signing of the Treaty of Rome in 1957, which initiated the construction of a political and economic Europe, it would take many years for the project to overcome the borders that history had erected between France and Germany.Efforts to erase the border have recently culminated with the inauguration of the Passerelle des Deux Rives in 2004, the effective disappearance of the border post on the Pont de l'Europe in 2009, and the re-establishment of the streetcar line from the center of Strasbourg to Kehl in 2017, 73 years after its closure at the end of the Second World War.While there are no physical obstacles to the crossing of the Rhine, differences in language, signage, architecture, legislation and lifestyles continue to exert "their separating effects."(Denni, 23)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it