MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7115190914 · doi:10.4000/15ch8

“He defies the law—and gets justice”: Erle Stanley Gardner's Perry Mason skating on thin ice with the authorities of the democratic state

2025· article· pt· W7115190914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBelphégor · 2025
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)DemocracyContradictionParatextPlot (graphics)Product (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Erle Stanley Gardner’s most famous protagonist, Perry Mason, defends the innocent and serves justice, but often uses ethically questionable means. The presentation of this contradiction in the paratext is examined, along with its elaboration in the genesis in the novels, against the background of their underlying plot and means of creating suspense. Mason’s tricks and violations against norms of authority are considered in terms of the potential to effect belief change in the absorbed and transported reader.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.025
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelphégorSame topicCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesFrench-language works237,207