Organizational Responses to The Covid-19 Pandemic on Youth Sport in Canada and Scotland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The primary research question in this second report focuses upon the organisational capacity and capability for youth sport pre, during and post covid The rational for the focus emanated from the scoping review of literature that identified a gap in what we know about how sports organizations responded and coped with the pandemic. In the wake of the COVID 19 sports organizations have had to reflect upon their adaptability, operations, people and sustainability. The report is structured around seven themes (i) a brief synopsis of impact of Covid 19 on youth sport in Canada and Scotland; (ii) a briefing note on the findings from national responses to the pandemic with a particular emphasis on Canada and Scotland; (iii) a critical reflection upon organizations and their state of readiness for the pandemic; (iv) a note on the methods used in this qualitative analysis of sports organisations; (v) the thematic findings form semi-structured interviews from Canadian and Scottish sports organisations; (vi) Key observations and recommendations from the two reports and (vii) a concluding remarks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".